lady_karelia (
lady_karelia) wrote2008-04-14 10:02 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
JKR vs SVA
I dunno. It might help for the fandom to stand united in this case and condemn Steve Vander Ark and show support for JKR. It was all dandy when he was just generating advertising revenue from the lexicon site, and I just cannot imagine that that only paid for keeping up the site. However, putting "his" lexicon into a book format, excluding the essays on the site to boot, reeks of greed. And plagiarism.
I am boycotting the lexicon.
The following were created by
southernwitch69 for use on profiles and as icons. Please credit her.




I am boycotting the lexicon.
The following were created by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)




no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
It seems that upon signing a contract with them (probably because he trusted their legal department) he may have also signed away his rights to stop the publication should JKR object.
If there's an evil here, and again this is only based on what I've read and a bit of experience with how publishing houses work, I think it's the publishing company. I think they were opportunistic and self-serving in how they defined "scholarly," and I think it's in horrifyingly poor taste (and with really bad judgment) that upon receipt of the information that JKR objected they did not immediately drop the project with an apology.
I don't think VDA should have trusted them as far as he did - but it may be that his worst error was simply in trusting a publishing house to know what they could and couldn't publish.
Anyway. My $.02.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
::points to icon:: gacked that one from
no subject
no subject