lady_karelia: (grammar2)
lady_karelia ([personal profile] lady_karelia) wrote2008-12-01 09:20 pm
Entry tags:

About the written word

Following the poll and discussion about what puts readers off (thanks, everyone, who engaged in it; it was very interesting and productive), some of you asked which trend I've been observing, so I figured it's easier to do this in a separate post rather than answering the same thing individually to everyone who asked.

Yes, I'll admit that I see a lot more behind the scenes going on, being an admin and a beta rather than a reader only. But it's all about writing. And yes, I realise that every reader has preferences and they may vary to the extreme between one reader and another, and that's good, for that makes for a vast variety of reading material to choose from. And just to clarify: This is my personal opinion. I've not discussed it with any other admins or other betas or anyone so far aside from yesterday's thread here on LJ.

The trends I've observed over the past few months are sloppiness, carelessness, and inflated ego development. These traits have increased quite substantially. None of them have a place in fiction writing. In case you wonder, allow me to extrapolate:

Sloppiness: When an author submits a chapter (or uploads to unmoderated archives) either without having it read by another set of eyes, even though it would need it, or failing to re-read it in order to weed out the errors they'd find on their own, or not using a spellcheck (and then give the excuse of not having MS Word; um, hello, google spellcheck, and you'll have choices), that is sloppy. If you can't be arsed to invest the time to offer something worth my time, what makes you think I'll take the time to invest in your stuff?

Carelessness: When an author submits/uploads a chapter that says pretty much nothing and then admits as much in the A/N. If you want to write fiction, then at least learn the basics, eh? Because if you don't, you'll always dream of reviews except for the ones from people sorry enough to waste even thirty seconds on your sorry attempt. I readily forgive a new author any mistakes they make. I also consider myself quite tolerant when an author's first language isn't English, and yeah, I can spot those from miles away. ;) Most readers are kind, especially if the first attempt speaks to them in one way or another. But if authors still make those same mistakes a few chapters later--and I'm talking about basics here, such as dialogue punctuation or a period at the end of the sentence--then I get the feeling that the author doesn't care.

Ego: If you write because you think you need your ego stroked, do the world a favour and stop. Just because you might have written and posted 200k worth of fic in the last year does not mean what you produce is of any value whatsoever. And getting indignant that nobody seems to care is not the way to go. Ask yourself what's wrong and look in the mirror. Then sit down and figure how to make it right, okay? And then, *gasp* write something from your heart. Write something because you feel the need to write it, and don't think about posting it. Leave it for a few days and go back to it and see if you still like it, and be objective about it. At least as objective as you can possibly be. Don't write for the sake of reviews; it will not make you happy. Of course, a lot of us are royal review whores; I certainly admit that of myself. But we don't think about reviews until after the chapter is posted.

Those are my gripes. Another gripe I've developed recently is that all those rec lists out there seem to include a lot of drivel. I realise it's pc to be kind and encouraging to dunderheads. I don't like to see it going as far as insulting my intelligence by recommending I'd waste my time on reading something that is so poorly written that it has little to do with actual fiction. But that's okay; I usually don't have time for pure pleasure-reading. The only reason I did a few days ago was because I was sick with a sore throat and headachy and snotty and wanted some light reading that would distract me from feeling miserable and all the RL stuff that's been going on lately. It saddens me, though. Some established writers recommend extremely poorly-written fics while ignoring well-written ones, and I can't help but conclude that they're afraid of having competition. Why else would they lower themselves to that level?

So there. No need to tell me I'm opinionated; I've known that for a while.

[identity profile] lady-karelia.livejournal.com 2008-12-02 06:05 am (UTC)(link)
Whores vs gluttons? Interesting idea! I've never thought about that. I mean, I know many newbies ask for reviews, and I've done so myself, but if an A/N contains a phrase along the lines of, 'I will post the next chapter as soon as I receive x amounts of reviews,' I tend to use that back button!

Pulp sounds interesting. The thing is, [livejournal.com profile] melenka considers her Gauntlet (http://www.thepetulantpoetess.com/viewstory.php?sid=8989) pulp, and that kind of sets the standard impossibly high. LOL. It has highly simmering, near boiling plot and not so predicting. Hm. Maybe a Cheese category?

[identity profile] pyjamapants.livejournal.com 2008-12-02 06:27 am (UTC)(link)
Author's notes can be quite revealing. I've scurried away from the following (to name a few):
-Comments about how they dashed off the chapter this morning and just *had* to get it posted
-Blatant requests for suggestions with the plot
-Pages of review responses at the beginning of the chapter on aff.net.... it makes me hardly ever review on aff.net - it feels like I'm contributing to the litter at the top of the chapter (though admittedly there's not all that many fics I read there)

I nearly fell off my chair laughing at your comment about the rec. I had the exact same experience about a month ago.... an embarrassing 22 chapters later I was entirely pissed to find that I'd read the whole damn thing. I went to bed at stupid o'clock, accidentally woke up my DH, and had a long conversation with him about 'why am I reading bad fic?'

'Cheese' as a category would be insulting to actual cheese. Perhaps 'brain candy'?

[identity profile] lady-karelia.livejournal.com 2008-12-02 06:51 am (UTC)(link)
oh, absolutely! IS why I tend to stay away from AFF or FFN in general. But my mind simply wasn't quite at it... Litter? Too right! *snickers*

Not cheese then. How about Velveeta? Cuz, honestly, brain candy? That sounds like a treat to the brain. LOL

[identity profile] melenka.livejournal.com 2008-12-02 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
That's because Gauntlet is a modern version of noir crime fiction and would totally be considered pulp if it were to see the light of day.

[identity profile] lady-karelia.livejournal.com 2008-12-03 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
I do hope it will see the light of day. :)